

If you want to tax the rich, tax the fucking rich. This is all theater.


If you want to tax the rich, tax the fucking rich. This is all theater.


The wording is weird. But the project (openslop) defines permissive as basically having a path for AI to enter the code. This lumps together both measured approaches like NetBSD’s and fully embracing slop contributions in the same category.
I think this only makes sense if you view AI contributions as a taint, something that threatens the licensing of a project. In that optic, it really is an all or nothing. But it doesn’t help users choose among the options as much.


Nope. You can build proprietary code on top of it, as long as you don’t distribute it. A company can create all its internal tools with copyleft code, and it would all be kosher. If they start sending that code elsewhere, then the license kicks in.


No risk of that happening.


2027: the year of HURD.
Nothing is set. Until there’s a challenge in court, all you stated as certainties are just conjectures.