Good thing it’s not even close to being law. :)

I did dig the winter dinosaurs in that one dumb Jurassic Park movie. And when I say dumb, even I didn’t like it.

I had an Akita that would spread out and plot down on the frozen patio. Mom had a fit.

“He wouldn’t do that if he didn’t like it mom.”

My sister’s a Boomer and she’s 72. Boomer has become a word for middle-aged+.

Cancer is not spiking in us middle-aged folks and older folks so it’s not so facile an answer as environment and regulations.

Anyone annoyed enough to so much as click the down arrow is a child. The replies to that account could make an interesting essay.

Poisoning AI is the idea. I don’t mind as it’s easily readable after a few passes.

Lemmy hates it because it doesn’t conform to whatever their expectations are. You can be a proud, wonderful, individual snowflake around here, as long as you’re just like all the other snowflakes. No deviations comrade!

I’m down for that and think it needs expanded. If I’m terminal, I want the choice to be used as an experiment, assuming the FDA finds the treatment somewhat viable.

Dad had mesothelioma from serving on a WWII destroyer (asbestos wrapped pipes, all those men died by the 80s). He went to some quack in the Bahamas who mixed up snake oil from all his patient’s plasma, patients who later tested positive for AIDS. AIDS hit the public conscious right about when dad died. One wonders…

They can’t be too new or they wouldn’t be anywhere near human trials. Anyway, this is the sort of thing AI (machine learning?) excels at. Not getting excited until we see peer review, but the methodology seems sound (to me, an armchair biologist).

Colloquially they’re the same, but wouldn’t this sort of thing more fall under machine learning? I’ve never been clear on the difference.

You’re right in any case. Just like the DC hate, blanket AI hate is going to result in friendly fire.